Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the broken-link-checker domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/vhosts/feps-europe.eu/staging.feps-europe.eu/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wordpress-seo domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/vhosts/feps-europe.eu/staging.feps-europe.eu/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
Staying in - A reform plan for Britain and Europe - Foundation for European Progressive Studies

Warning: Undefined variable $printName in /var/www/vhosts/feps-europe.eu/staging.feps-europe.eu/wp-content/themes/fepseuropetheme/inc/feps-view-function.php on line 1522

Warning: Undefined variable $attachedPublicationHTML in /var/www/vhosts/feps-europe.eu/staging.feps-europe.eu/wp-content/themes/fepseuropetheme/template-parts/content-publication.php on line 224

Warning: Undefined variable $attachedEventHTML in /var/www/vhosts/feps-europe.eu/staging.feps-europe.eu/wp-content/themes/fepseuropetheme/template-parts/content-publication.php on line 353

Staying in – A reform plan for Britain and Europe

Policy Study

09/10/2014

Britain’s relationship with the EU is at crisis point. This timely report published by FEPS and IPPR (Institute for Public Policy Research), in the UK examines British public opinion on Europe and illustrates many reasons why Britain is clearly better off “staying in”.

This report provides very a relevant contribution to the debates currently taking place concerning Britain’s membership to the EU.

Public opinion in the UK concerning the EU is reaching new lows. Many people believe a referendum is necessary. The report gives clear geopolitical, economic and cultural reasons for staying in the EU. Nevertheless it also argues that if a referendum were to be held it should be a clear in/out question.

The report is in the frame of the results from a research project carried out in the UK which included gathering public opinion to understand where public opinion lies in relation to the European economy, social Europe, and European democracy.

Chapter 1 of the report examines British public opinion on Europe by examining time-series data, recent polling and the outcomes of two deliberative workshops in order to outline the mainly negative, but sometimes nuanced, views of citizens. Chapter 2 makes the case for an in/out referendum and argues that on geopolitical, economic and cultural grounds, Britain would be better off staying in. Chapter 3 sets out the case for, and means of creating, growth in Europe, with particular reference to the forthcoming debate on the EU’s next seven-year budget. Chapter 4 looks at the democratic reforms that Britain should push for in Europe, including in relation to its institutions, regulatory agenda and external role. The conclusion summarises the main recommendations.

Also linked to this debate Ernst Stetter, Secretary General of FEPS blog post concerning the EU budget – click here.

The report is available online below. Some hard copies are available, please contact us if you would like to receive a hard copy.

Network
Institute for Public Policy Research
Find all related publications
Publications
10/07/2024

Digital regulatory power but technology taker

How do we create an ecosystem for the European digital model
03/07/2024

Embracing Feminist Foreign Policy within EU strategic foresight capabilities

03/07/2024

Building Economic Democracy in Europe

Concepts, Cases and Achieving Progressive Change
20/06/2024

Responsibility-sharing or shifting?

New Pact Implementation series
Find all related Progressive Post
Progressive Post
12/07/2024

After the general election, France in a political conundrum

12/07/2024

Le Pen’s delayed victory

12/07/2024

French united Left first in elections – a new breath for French democracy

Find all related news
News
04/07/2024

FEPS Delegation attends T20/C20 Midterm Conference in Brazil

27/06/2024

Join Tax the EU Billionaires Day!

25/06/2024

The EUROPAEUM delegation visits FEPS

20/06/2024

FEPS celebrates its annual General Assembly and welcomes new members

Find all related in the media
In the media

Eurozone Finance Ministers to talk belt tightening

by POLITICO 15/07/2024
FEPS Secretary General László Andor discusses the rise of supply-side progressivism following the success of the Labour Party in the UK Elections with POLITICO

NATO-bővítés sok vitával: érvek, ellenérvek és lobbik a Clinton-elnökség idején

by BBC History 07/07/2024
"The controversial NATO enlargement: pros, cons and lobbying during the Clinton presidency" This article, written by FEPS Secretary General László Andor, looks back to the 1990s when the Eastern enlargement of NATO was requested, discussed, orchestrated, and eventually completed.

Falsely historic European elections bring little change, says FEPS

by Agence Europe 18/06/2024
Agence Europe's article features an analysis of the EU election results by Ania Skrzypek, FEPS Director for Research and Training, published in The Progressive Post.

Die EU-Osterweiterung nach 20 Jahren: Kann die Konvergenz sozial und wirtschaftlich nachhaltig gestaltet werden?

by Wirtschaftsdienst 13/06/2024
'EU Eastward Enlargement After 20 Years: Socially and Economically Sustainable Convergence?' FEPS Secretary General László Andor co-authored this article of the German journal Wirtschaftsdienst